There is no such thing as a pure introvert or extrovert. Such a person would be in the lunatic asylum. ~ Carl G Jung
It was when he started saying things like “you must be an INTJ” and “thinkers are more objective than feelers” that I became more interested in staring outside the window than listening to this guy – a psychology student. Personality types are fascinating to talk about, but depending on who’s doing the talking, it can get a bit too stiff for me.
Often I’ve wondered why I’m less than enthusiastic about my personality type, or types. There are as many personality tests based on Introversion and Extroversion as there are types: Jung’s Typology, Big 5, Myers Briggs, Socionics, Enneagram. Sometimes I’m an introvert, others I’m extroverted, sometimes a feeler and others a thinker. For many, personality types provide a lucid way of understanding what were felt to be the abstract traits of ones character. Finally we can share on our Facebook and twitter pages that we’re “INFJ’s!”, “ISTP’s!!”, “ISFJ’s!!!” We seem to believe that our entire emotional and mental functions as a human being perfectly correlate with this well thought out, 4 letter description of who we are. Introspection and self-analysis just became a whole lot easier – just 70 questions away to discover who you really are.
But amidst all the introvert and extrovert extremist polarity hype there exists one forgotten type. The Ambivert. I had once remotely read of the term Ambivert while perusing through Young’s “Source Book for Social Psychology“. I’ve scoured the internet extensively and found very little on the subject. It seems this ambiguous, complicated, mythical creature is nowhere to be found.
Continuum Personality Scale
Introversion and extroversion are typically viewed as a single continuum. In other words: to be high in one, it is necessary to be low in the other. Jung and Briggs proposed that everyone has both an extroverted side and an introverted side, one having more predominance than the other. However, Isabel Briggs Myers only strictly allowed the classification of these two types, even though she based her work on Jung’s theory. Jung was of the idea that there was a third “middle” group. The Ambivert.
“There is, finally, a third group… the most numerous and includes the less differentiated normal man… He constitutes the extensive middle group… I call the first group extraverted and the second group introverted.” (p516, Psychological Types)
This would allow for the possibility that the majority of the population are in fact Ambiverts. Ambiverts seem like a grey area in the personality-type world. Inconveniently, paying attention to the Ambivert would present a difficult and unnecessary complication – that is, that the entire population couldn’t be squeezed into one of two boxes. Tests can never be accurate because the psyche doesn’t work in percentages. In fact, the introvert and extrovert notion was never intended to be a testable dichotomy. The concept of the Introvert and Extrovert was originally intended to determine whether a function is introverted or extroverted – not a person. However, the MBTI asserts otherwise (take our free personality test based on it here.)
Fifty Shades of Ambivert
Isn’t is more likely that our personalities are varying mixtures of introverted and extroverted functions instead of say, all functions being introverted or extroverted?
I believe that people are simply more dynamically complex than the way we polarize ourselves. The most shameless of party-goers has his insecurities, and the quietest at work can be the wildest at night. Put simply, when we’re in a comfortable environment, we’re more likely to be ourselves.
The majority of us have traits of both personalities which are contextually driven. In other words, the majority of our behavior is a result of our interactions with a situation.
If an “extrovert” has to present an assignment, he may become an introvert for the day by blocking out exterior stimulation and getting lost in a world of thought. Jung defined introversion as an “attitude-type characterised by orientation in life through subjective psychic contents” (or focus on one’s inner psychic activity). Extroversion on the other hand was defined as “an attitude type characterised by concentration of interest on the external object” (or the outside world).
This means that just because you are considered an “introvert” does not mean you’re highly introspective and posses much self-knowledge. Most likely, it’s simply your “Extroverted” brain function that becomes over stimulated easily, causing you to avoid socializing. Meanwhile, you’re still getting lost in a world outside of your ‘self’, just like an extrovert does, by reading a fantasy book, or getting lost in a video game (an extrovert thought function). You may have a big imagination, but the function of your brain that finds ‘fun’ in storylines is the same as the extroverts who find ‘fun’ in experiences. Neither is left in solitude with the introverted function of self-analysis and introspection (introvert thought function). Simply put, you can have an extroverted mind while still functioning as an introvert.
However, there are those rare true unwavering personality types who possess almost all dominant extrovert functions and no introverted functions regardless of the situation. Even presenting an assignment would involve yapping away with others. Or for instance, the predominantly introverted functioners who find no sense of fun in celebrating birthdays or anything even with their closest loved ones, and would rather read a book instead.
The Freedom Of Being an Ambivert
From my understanding, Jung would say that we all have “preferences” of what we would like to do, but we also have the capacity to be able to be both introverted and extroverted. And as we get older, we slowly migrate towards the center of the continuum scale in most of our functions, as part of the self-actualization process. The majority of people, although slanted towards one side of the scale, operate using traits and preferences from both sides.
Ambiverts are people who don’t really prefer one way of functioning over another. In other words, you could say they’re the neutral, middle-ground hippies. They’re equally comfortable in situations where the introvert feels most at home and situations where the extrovert is having a good time. That being said, I would consider myself an Ambivert. I don’t feel drained from social interaction or going out shopping, and discussion energizes and invigorates me. I constantly seek daredevil risk-taking stimulation, while simultaneously relishing quiet time with my books and catching up on scientific essays. I’m both overly confident, but also reclusive and critical in thought.
The freedom with Ambiversion comes in finding both Introverted and Extroverted worlds satisfying and rewarding. Ambiversion helps you to enjoy a varied life. Ambiverts have enough introversion to slowly absorb the world around them and enough extroversion to be able to propound ideas and express themselves (through writing of verbally) without feeling depleted.
The notion of Ambiversion changed my life. Previously, when filling in a personality type questionnaire, I”d hesitate when answering questions like: “would you prefer to go to a party or read a book?” My first thought was “Depends on the party or book and also how tired I am from the previous night.” But that contextual option wasn’t available. Now I realize what a gift it is to be sensible, reasonable and well balanced enough to have the freedom of choice.
I don’t consider myself either extroverted or introverted. Even though I may be 49% extrovert and 51% introvert, I’m equally labeled an INTJ. Yet other’s with 99% introvert and 1% extrovert are still labelled INTJ’s. Superficially we have the same label, but psychologically we are entirely different. This is why I much prefer the Big 5 Personality traits, and their more balanced way of analyzing our personalities.
I’m an Ambivert with 70 shades of Introvert and 30 shades of Extrovert! What are you?
Did you know: You can take our Introvert, Ambivert or Extrovert Test?
Whenever you feel the call, there are 3 ways I can help you:
1. The Spiritual Wanderer Course: Need "big picture" direction, clarity, and focus? Our Spiritual Wanderer course is a crystallization of 10+ years of inner work, and it can help you find your deeper path and purpose in life as a spiritual wanderer. You get 3+ hours of audio-visual content, workbooks, meditations, a premium test, and more!.
2. Shadow & Light Membership: Want weekly intuitive guidance to support you on your awakening path? This affordable membership can help you to befriend your dark side, rediscover more self-love, and reclaim inner wholeness.
3. Spiritual Awakening Bundle: Looking for a collection of all our essential transformative resources? You get five enlightening ebooks, seven in-depth journals, plus two empowering bonuses to help you soul search, heal, and awaken.
I totally agree with the whole “Depends on what book it is, what kind of party it is, and how tired I am”. :)
Thanks for the discussion and awareness spreading on ambiversion. I’ve taken the quiz a few times and scored every time in the 65-75% range, with slight variation depending on mood, which lines up exactly with what I know about myself re: the extrovert/introvert dichotomy. I know I’m somewhat of an unusual case in the E/I discussion – in another life, I’m pretty sure I would be significantly even further to the extrovert end of the spectrum, but I was severely emotionally abused as a child, a situation I only was able to get out of within the past five years, and I deal with a lot of complex PTSD issues as a result. Forced shyness was actively used as a means of control in my situation – from as young as I could remember, my abusive parent would jump in before I could answer questions from others outside of my family situation with a response of, “oh, she’s so shy, she’s too nervous to even speak, I’ll have to answer for her.” I’m also far enough above average intellectually that growing up, I fought a lot of rhetoric from teachers and pop culture equating traditional intelligence and responsibility with introversion… Read more »
Took the quiz and scored a 47% so guess that makes me 47 shades of introvert and 53 shades of extrovert(?).
Also a great article. Thanks for the read :)
Hi Mateo, this is a great article! I came across the term ‘ambivert’ when I was searching for an ‘in-between’ on the introversion/extroversion spectrum for a friend. It’s so satisfying to know that there’s not only two terms.
I have two questions:
1. Can A (for Ambivert) be put in place of I/E (for Introvert/Extrovert) on your Myers-Briggs personality type?
2. Can depression cause introversion? Because I’m all my tests say I’m an introvert and I have depression and social anxiety disorder, but I feel like if I didn’t have any mental health issues I would be an extrovert? Because I love interacting with people and socialising but my depression tends to get in the way of that. I’m currently in therapy, so do you think when I finish therapy I could be an extrovert?
I hope this made sense, thank you!
I. BLOODY. WELL. LOVE. THIS. THANK YOU. I’ve been thinking the same thing about the Myers-Briggs recently–that even if I’m borderline extroverted or extremely extroverted, or somewhat ESFJ-ish vs. STRONGLY ESFJ-ish, I’m still stuck with the same personality profile. Then I stumbled upon this article, and lo and behold, someone else voicing the same opinion (though I’m sure there are many who would agree with that assessment). Still, it felt GREAT to have my thought validated by another party (you, haha). Recently, I’ve been on a bit of a MBTI-Psychology spree. People display a variety of behaviors that change with a given situation, and most, if not all people fall somewhere on a spectrum of a given trait (thinking/feeling, judging/perceiving, etc…). As a result, I’m frustrated with the Myers-Briggs test in that it doesn’t seem to account for shades of grey in people’s personalities (then again, I don’t think there is a test that does–it is simply not possible, given the complexity of human personality). I also don’t like being put in a box, as I feel that the test embraces some aspects of who I am and ignores others (again, as would be the case for everyone). Anyhow, it’s… Read more »
Hi! I’m just wondering. What do you think about astrology?
I understand that the test doesn’t talk about ambiverts which makes me mad because i am too but in actuality your wrong. Actually if you look in to it and have actually done your research it doesn’t just tell you that your a pure introvert or a pure extrovert.
I am an Introvert, I know that I have displayed extrovert characteristics. Nevertheless, I am still introverted. I can attest that types are not set in stone; I scored a rather high percentage to introversion. Until I meet my girlfriend, and then I noticed a decline. The test(based on Jung and Briggs) on the human metrics site displays percentages, and for a good reason. Those percentages signify the strength of preference over the other. Also, people also fail to consider the development of other functions from Jung’s theory.
although i have not read the entire article the term introvert or introvert is not the entire personality more it is the dominate archetype a more refined simplified personality traits look up why him why her in fact there are many types
What a breath of fresh air this is. I have often straddled the intro/extro fence, but never known until recently there was a name for that. I can be chatty with a small group of people for ten minutes, but then I can be in a corner surveying the crowd for another ten and enjoy that almost as much. What a disservice the “how to talk to an introvert” meme is doing to us. What a refreshing thing it is to find evidence that there’s a spectrum for this, though in hindsight it should have made perfect sense to me long ago. Yaaay for ambiverts!